Locations

Resources

Careers

Contact

Contact us

Post-Signature EA Management & True-Up Governance

Handling Microsoft EA Audits and True-Downs

Handling Microsoft EA Audits and True-Downs

Handling Microsoft EA Audits

Introduction: Why EA Audits and True-Downs Matter

Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) audits, along with the lack of true-down flexibility, pose significant risks for organizations. An EA is a long-term licensing contract that often assumes your software usage will stay constant or grow.

Even if your needs shrink, you generally cannot scale down your licenses mid-term. Meanwhile, Microsoft can audit your compliance, leading to surprise costs if you’re unprepared. Read our ultimate guide to Post-Signature EA Management & True-Up Governance (Maximizing Value After Signing).

Proactive planning and robust governance are crucial to mitigating these risks.

By understanding what triggers an EA audit and acknowledging that you can’t reduce licenses mid-term, you can plan accordingly.

Maintain accurate records, negotiate any flexibility you can upfront, and conduct regular internal license reviews so that any Microsoft audit simply confirms your compliance, rather than exposing issues.

RiskMitigation Strategy
Unbudgeted true-up costs (surprise growth)Track software deployments continuously and forecast usage to avoid spikes in license count and fees at true-up time.
Paying for unused licenses (no true-down)Right-size license counts at renewal and consider subscription models or contract clauses that allow some mid-term adjustments.
Audit uncovers a compliance shortfallConduct regular internal license audits and fix any issues proactively long before Microsoft might audit you.
Audit process disrupts business operationsMaintain a documented audit response plan and designate a team to handle audits, minimizing impact on everyday work.

Microsoft EA Audit Triggers

Microsoft typically initiates an EA compliance audit when it detects signs that an organization’s licensing might be out of alignment. Knowing these audit triggers helps you stay ahead of potential issues.

Common triggers include unusual usage patterns, inconsistent reporting, and major changes in your IT environment.

In short, any indication that you might be using more software than you paid for can raise a red flag.

  • Unusual consumption growth: A sudden surge in users or deployments can signal that usage is outpacing licensed entitlements.
  • Irregular true-up reporting: Inconsistencies or minimal growth reported during annual true-ups can trigger scrutiny. If you report minimal usage growth for a couple of years and then a large jump in the final year, it may appear you delayed reporting to save on costs.
  • Major product or environment changes: Significant shifts, such as mergers, acquisitions, or large migrations, often prompt Microsoft to verify that all deployments are properly licensed. Dropping a Microsoft product mid-term can also prompt a compliance check.

By staying aware of these triggers, you can prepare accordingly. Maintain detailed, up-to-date records of the licenses you own and the software deployed. If a major usage spike or environment change is on the horizon, evaluate the licensing impact beforehand and communicate with Microsoft if necessary to preempt misunderstandings.

Checklist: EA Audit Preparedness

  • An accurate, up-to-date inventory of all Microsoft licenses and current deployments is maintained.
  • Internal license compliance reviews are conducted regularly (e.g., before each true-up).
  • An audit response plan is in place, and a responsible team is ready to engage if an audit is initiated.

Prepare for your next EA: Preparing for Next Round: Documentation and Lessons Learned.

Building an EA Audit Response Plan

Despite your best efforts to stay compliant, it’s wise to have a plan in case Microsoft initiates an audit.

Building a solid EA audit response plan involves clearly defining how your organization will handle an audit notice, including the steps to be taken, the individuals involved, and the approach to managing communications. A well-crafted plan can turn a chaotic audit into a controlled process.

First, as soon as you receive an audit notice, perform your own internal compliance check. Gather and verify all deployment data against your license entitlements to ensure compliance with your license terms.

By identifying any compliance gaps yourself, you can address them or prepare explanations before sharing information with Microsoft. Consider involving a licensing specialist to ensure your data is accurate and that you correctly apply Microsoft’s licensing rules during this self-audit.

Next, determine whether the notice is a formal contract audit or an informal review request. If it’s a contractual audit, comply with the terms of your agreement (methodically and within your timeline).

If it’s an informal SAM review invitation, you can negotiate the timing or scope, or even decline. In all cases, maintain clear records by keeping communications in writing.

  • Run an internal self-audit first: Immediately assess your deployments versus entitlements to catch any licensing shortfalls internally. This allows you to proactively address minor issues or, at the very least, know where you stand before the external audit begins.
  • Involve experts early: Engage your software asset management team or a third-party licensing consultant to validate your findings. Also, loop in your legal or contracts department to ensure Microsoft adheres to the audit terms in your agreement (notice period, scope, confidentiality, etc.).
  • Coordinate cooperation and communication: For a formal audit, comply with Microsoft’s requests in a controlled and orderly manner; if it’s an informal review invitation, negotiate the scope or timing instead of immediately agreeing. In all cases, designate a single point of contact, maintain professional and documented interactions, meet deadlines (requesting extensions if necessary), and provide only the information requested.

Checklist: Audit Response Readiness

  • A documented EA audit response playbook exists, outlining each step and the corresponding staff members responsible.
  • Key stakeholders (IT, procurement, legal, etc.) understand the plan and their roles during an audit.
  • External licensing advisors or legal counsel are available, and contract audit clauses have been reviewed to ensure a transparent process with no surprises.

Read how to optimize, Optimizing During the EA Term: Don’t Wait for Renewal.

Rightsizing and True-Down Options in Microsoft EA

One of the biggest challenges in an EA is the inability to reduce license counts mid-term. In a standard Microsoft EA, once you commit to several licenses for the term (typically three years), you can only increase that number via annual “true-ups.” Decreasing it (a “true-down”) is not allowed until the term ends.

This means if your needs shrink – due to staff reductions, project cancellations, or efficiency gains – you may pay for licenses you no longer use. Understanding this one-way street is key to avoiding wasted spend. Therefore, plan carefully and avoid over-committing to licenses from the start.

However, there are a few scenarios and strategies that can provide some mid-term flexibility:

  • Product retirement by Microsoft: If Microsoft discontinues a product you’ve licensed, they will often allow you to replace those licenses with a successor product or apply a credit elsewhere. Stay informed on Microsoft’s product lifecycle changes to take advantage of this.
  • Transition to new bundles or cloud services: If you migrate to a new Microsoft product bundle or cloud service mid-term, Microsoft may permit a license swap. Typically, you agree to move into a new service of equal or greater value. In return, Microsoft allows you to reduce or cancel the old product licenses through an EA amendment.
  • Enterprise Subscription Agreement (EAS): This variant of the EA allows for an annual true-down. With an EAS, you subscribe to licenses rather than owning them, and you have the right to decrease license counts at each anniversary if your usage declines. The trade-off is a slightly higher annual cost and no perpetual ownership in exchange for flexibility.

Because true-down options are so limited in a standard EA, it’s crucial to set a realistic license count up front. Conduct thorough usage forecasting before signing or renewing an EA to avoid locking in far more licenses than you need.

If you do find yourself with excess licenses mid-term, plan how you’ll address it — whether by using more of what you’ve paid for, negotiating a swap or credit, or simply adjusting the countdown at renewal.

Checklist: Annual True-Down Planning

  • A yearly review compares license entitlements to actual usage, flagging any over-licensing or under-usage.
  • Microsoft product roadmap updates are monitored for announcements (e.g., product end-of-life or new bundles) that might enable mid-term license adjustments.
  • Potential chances to reduce or reallocate licenses (through product swaps, an EAS, etc.) are documented and considered ahead of each anniversary.

Exiting Products Mid-Term

Business or technology changes may render a particular Microsoft product unnecessary before your EA term is up. For example, you might decide to decommission a legacy on-premises system and transition entirely to a cloud solution, even if you still have time left on your EA.

In a normal EA, you would be stuck paying for those legacy product licenses until the term ends, even if they’re not used. With careful planning and negotiation, however, you can minimize the financial waste and possibly reclaim some value from those unused licenses.

If you plan to exit a product mid-term, start a conversation with Microsoft well in advance.

You likely cannot cancel those licenses outright, but Microsoft often has programs or incentives to help facilitate transitions:

  • Negotiate credits for unused licenses: You won’t get a refund for dropping a product, but Microsoft may grant a credit that you can apply to other services.
  • License swap via amendment: In some cases, you can amend your EA to swap one product’s licenses for another of equal value. Always formalize such agreements in writing.
  • Cloud Transition Incentives: If you’re moving to a Microsoft cloud service, inquire about special incentives. Microsoft often offers discounts or other benefits when you adopt its cloud solutions.

For any product you plan to retire mid-term, have an internal exit strategy in place and inform Microsoft promptly. Microsoft would rather retain you as a customer of one of their platforms than lose you entirely, so they may be more willing to accommodate changes if they know you’re considering a switch (especially to their cloud offerings).

Early communication can make Microsoft a partner in your transition plan rather than an obstacle.

Checklist: Mid-Term Product Change Management

  • A product exit strategy is defined for any major software that may be decommissioned during the EA term.
  • Planned product retirements or migrations are communicated to Microsoft with plenty of notice to explore possible adjustments or incentives.
  • Any agreed license swaps or credit arrangements are captured through a formal contract amendment for accountability.

Maintaining EA License Compliance

The best defense against audit risks is to maintain strong license compliance at all times. Instead of treating compliance as a once-a-year true-up task, make it an ongoing practice. This proactive approach significantly reduces the likelihood of surprises during an audit and can even uncover opportunities to optimize your license usage.

Implement robust tracking of license entitlements and deployments to ensure accurate and up-to-date information is maintained. Many organizations use Software Asset Management (SAM) tools to monitor Microsoft software usage across servers, PCs, and cloud services.

Conduct periodic internal audits, such as quarterly or semi-annually, to ensure that actual usage aligns with purchased licenses. Regular checkups help catch any accidental over-deployments or unused licenses (“shelfware”) early.

At EA renewal time, negotiate audit terms in your favor (e.g,. advance notice or limited frequency) to minimize disruption. Integrate license checks into routine IT operations: ensure that any new deployment or user onboarding includes a licensing review, and educate staff on how their actions (such as adding a server or user) affect licensing.

Checklist: Ongoing Compliance Governance

  • A software asset management tool or process is actively tracking Microsoft license deployments and usage.
  • License compliance and usage reports are reviewed with stakeholders on a regular schedule (quarterly or similar).
  • EA contract terms regarding audits and true-ups are revisited at each renewal to negotiate improvements (such as clearer audit procedures or flexibility for changing needs).

5 Actionable Tips for EA Audit & True-Down Management

  • Track Continuously, Not Annually: Don’t wait for the yearly true-up. Continuously monitor your license usage versus entitlements to catch issues early and avoid surprises.
  • Simulate Audits Internally: Perform your own periodic license audits. When Microsoft audits, it should simply confirm what you already know about your compliance status.
  • Plan for True-Down Exceptions: Stay alert for chances to reduce licenses legally. If products are discontinued or you have flexible subscription terms, take advantage of those rare true-down opportunities to save costs.
  • Negotiate Cloud Credits: If you must drop a product mid-term, try to get something back. Ask Microsoft for credits or discounts toward new cloud services to recoup the value of unused licenses.
  • Formalize Your Audit Response: Don’t Ad Lib an Audit. Have a documented response plan with clear roles and steps, so your team can handle any Microsoft audit calmly and efficiently.

Read about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Service.

Microsoft EA Management & True Up Strategies - How to Maximize Value After Signing

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Services?

Name

Author

  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts