Microsoft EA Cost Optimization: Strategies to Reduce Spend and Eliminate Waste

Microsoft EA Cost Optimization

Introduction: Why Microsoft EA Cost Optimization Matters

Microsoft Enterprise Agreements (EAs) lock organizations into multi-year licensing commitments with Microsoft.

While an EA can offer volume discounts and simplify license management, it also means you pay for a set amount of licenses and services, whether you use them fully or not.

Without active optimization, companies often end up overpaying for shelfware licenses that remain unused, as well as unused cloud capacity.

In an era of tight IT budgets, every dollar counts. Cost optimization in your Microsoft EA is about ensuring you’re only paying for what delivers value, not what Microsoft’s sales team managed to bundle in.

Actively managing and optimizing your EA can drive significant savings. It prevents waste such as idle software subscriptions or oversized cloud resources that drain your budget. More importantly, it puts you back in control of your IT spending.

The following strategies cover key phases and components of the EA lifecycle, from pre-signature planning to day-to-day license management, Azure cost control, and continuous governance, to help CIOs, procurement leaders, and IT asset managers reduce spend and eliminate waste.

1. Pre-Signature EA Cost Savings Strategies

The best time to save money on a Microsoft EA is before you sign the contract. Microsoft will often push for larger upfront commitments, suggesting that “more is better” or promising future needs.

Instead, take a skeptical, data-driven approach to sizing your agreement:

• Right-size your license mix before signing – Analyze your organization’s actual needs for each Microsoft product and license tier to ensure a tailored approach. Rather than automatically purchasing Microsoft’s top-tier bundles for everyone, determine how many users truly need premium editions (such as Office 365 E5) versus standard ones (like E3). Tailor the mix of license types to match real usage patterns so you purchase only what’s necessary at the outset.
• Avoid buying more upfront than necessary — Don’t let Microsoft upsell you on extra licenses “just in case.” If you anticipate growth or new projects, remember you can always add licenses later via true-ups. It’s safer to start with a conservative license count that meets current requirements and then scale up if needed, rather than over-committing to licenses that might remain unused. True-ups (annual adjustments where you report and pay for any added usage) are built into the EA for this reason – use them to your advantage to defer costs until there’s a real demand.
• Use benchmarks to push for better discounts – Enter negotiations armed with data. Research the discount levels and pricing similar organizations have achieved on their EAs. If you know peers or industry benchmarks (for example, the percentage off Microsoft’s list price), you can challenge Microsoft’s initial quote. Be willing to push back and ask for pricing concessions, extended payment terms, or additional benefits (such as Azure credits) based on the value of your deal. Microsoft’s first offer is often not the best – strong preparation and a bit of assertiveness can yield a significantly better discount.

Checklist: Pre-signature optimization review completed? (Have you vetted license needs, negotiated pricing, and avoided any upfront shelfware before signing?)

2. Reducing Shelfware During the EA Term

Once your EA is in place, it’s critical to continually identify and eliminate shelfware – any licenses or subscriptions you’re paying for but not actively using.

Shelfware typically creeps in when organizations grow or change and licenses aren’t reallocated, or when product bundles include components no one ends up needing.

To reduce this waste during the EA term:

• Identify unused licenses and reallocate them – Regularly audit your license assignments and software usage to ensure optimal allocation of licenses. Look for users who have licenses assigned but haven’t been using the service (for example, an employee with an Office 365 account who hasn’t logged in for months). Reclaim those underutilized licenses and reassign them to someone who actually needs them, rather than purchasing new licenses. This practice, often called license harvesting, ensures you get value out of every license you’re paying for. Many organizations perform a quarterly “shelfware report” to highlight unused entitlements across Microsoft 365, Windows, and other products.
• Remove redundant or unused products at renewal – Over the course of a multi-year EA, you may find that certain products in your agreement overlap with other tools or are no longer useful. For instance, you might have deployed a third-party solution that renders one of the Microsoft components redundant, or perhaps a Microsoft product included in your bundle was not adopted by users. Plan for your EA renewal by identifying these candidates and removing them from the contract if they are no longer needed. Microsoft allows reductions and changes at the renewal point, so take advantage of this opportunity to eliminate any unnecessary software from your portfolio.

By tackling shelfware methodically, you prevent paying for idle software. It’s not a one-time task—set a schedule (monthly or quarterly) to review usage metrics and keep the license allocation tightly aligned with actual needs.

Checklist: Shelfware report produced quarterly? (Are you routinely checking for unused licenses and reclaiming or removing them?)

3. Microsoft License Optimization Techniques

Beyond simply removing unused licenses, organizations can optimize how they allocate and manage licenses to squeeze more value from their EA. Microsoft’s product suites offer flexibility – if you use them smartly.

Here are key techniques to optimize licenses:

• Mix license levels and editions – Microsoft bundles, such as Office 365 and Microsoft 365, come in tiers (e.g., E3 vs. E5 for Enterprise). The E5 tier includes advanced security, analytics, and voice features at a significantly higher cost per user, whereas E3 covers core functionality at a lower price. To avoid overspending, deploy a mix of license levels: assign expensive E5 licenses only to users who genuinely require those extra features (such as specific executives or power users), and provide everyone else with the more economical E3 (or even E1/F3 for frontline workers) plus any necessary add-on licenses. Similarly, consider add-on subscriptions for specific functionality instead of upgrading an entire user to a higher tier. This targeted approach prevents paying for features that a large portion of your staff doesn’t utilize.
• Re-harvest licenses when employees leave or roles change – Implement an internal process to immediately recoup licenses from departing staff and to adjust licenses when people change roles. For example, if an employee with multiple Microsoft 365 licenses leaves the company, ensure those licenses are freed up in the system and available for reassignment. Likewise, if a user no longer needs a certain product (for example, a developer moves out of a role that requires a Visual Studio subscription), revoke that license. Aggressive re-harvesting means the next new hire or project can often be accommodated with existing licenses, saving the cost of buying additional licenses that the organization already has in its entitlement pool.
• Use Software Asset Management (SAM) tools for visibility and control – Gaining clear visibility into your license usage is half the battle in optimization. Specialized SAM tools, such as Microsoft’s own 365 Admin Center reports, can help track which users are actually using their licenses and which features are being utilized. A good SAM tool will alert you to anomalies, such as unused licenses, flag compliance gaps, and help simulate optimizations (e.g., “what if we downgrade these 200 users from E5 to E3?”). By having data-driven insights, your team can proactively adjust license allocations and ensure compliance without over-licensing. These tools add some overhead, but they often pay for themselves by uncovering opportunities to reduce spend.

To illustrate the impact of these optimization levers, consider the following comparison of optimization tactics vs. potential savings vs. complexity:

By combining these techniques, organizations create a continuous optimization cycle – always tuning license assignments so that spend closely aligns with actual usage and business value delivered.

Checklist: License optimization process implemented and monitored? (Do you have a system and tools in place to continually adjust licenses and avoid overspending?)

4. Cloud Cost Optimization in the EA (Azure Focus)

For organizations with Azure services bundled into their Microsoft EA, cloud spend can be another big area of waste if left unchecked. Azure’s flexibility is a double-edged sword: it’s easy to spin up resources that drive up costs.

Optimize your Azure usage within the EA with these tactics:

• Right-size VMs and remove unused resources – Regularly review your Azure environment for instances of over-provisioning. Often, virtual machines (VMs) run at 10% CPU utilization or have allocated far more memory than the workload requires. By resizing those VMs to smaller, more cost-effective instance types or shutting them off during non-peak hours, you can immediately reduce costs. Likewise, delete unattached storage volumes, orphaned snapshots, and idle services that are billing you despite not delivering value. Treat cloud resources like a utility: turn off or downsize anything you’re not actively using. Establish policies for resource owners to clean up or justify underutilized assets – this discipline can substantially reduce your monthly Azure bill.
• Utilize reserved instances and negotiate Azure credits – Leverage Azure’s pricing options to reduce costs. Reserved Instances (or Azure Savings Plans) let you commit to a certain amount of usage for one or three years in exchange for discounts often in the range of 20-50% compared to pay-as-you-go rates. Identify stable, 24×7 workloads in your environment and consider reserving capacity for them to reap these savings. Additionally, when negotiating or renewing your EA, consider securing Azure credits or consumption funds from Microsoft. Especially if you’re increasing cloud usage or migrating new workloads to Azure, Microsoft might provide credits to offset costs or incentives as part of the deal. Ensure that any Azure commitment aligns with your actual needs – avoid overcommitting to cloud spend, as this can result in paying for unused capacity (the cloud equivalent of shelfware).

Azure cost optimization should be an ongoing practice integrated with your overall EA governance. Many companies tie cloud cost reviews to their IT governance meetings, ensuring that right-sizing and cleanup are continuous activities, not one-time projects.

Checklist: Azure optimization reviews tied into governance? (Do you routinely review Azure usage and costs, and adjust resources or commitments as part of your IT governance process?)

5. Ongoing EA Governance for Cost Control

Optimizing a Microsoft EA isn’t a “set and forget” exercise – it requires ongoing governance and internal accountability. Establishing a regular cadence to review and adjust your EA ensures that savings persist and new waste doesn’t creep in.

Key practices for sustained cost control include:

• Run semi-annual usage vs. entitlement reviews – At least twice a year (if not quarterly), conduct a thorough review of all Microsoft licenses and cloud services under your EA. Compare the entitlements you’re paying for against actual usage data. This review should highlight any significant underutilization (for example, if you paid for 500 Visio licenses but only 100 people actively use them, or if you have 1000 Azure VM cores provisioned but only 700 cores are truly in use on average). Use these insights to make adjustments: trim down or eliminate unused services at the next opportunity, and plan any needed true-ups for growth areas. Regular check-ins prevent small inefficiencies from turning into large expenses over time.
• Document savings and use them as renewal leverage – Keep a running tally of all the cost optimizations and savings achieved throughout the EA term. For instance, note how reassigning licenses saved $X, or how rightsizing Azure resources saved $Y per month. By documenting these wins, you create a compelling story to present during your EA renewal negotiations. You can demonstrate to Microsoft that your organization is disciplined about cost management and won’t overbuy unnecessary services. This track record strengthens your hand in asking for better renewal pricing or terms—because you have proof that you won’t fall for overselling and that you’ll optimize whatever you purchase. Internally, documenting savings also helps justify the importance of the optimization program to executives, turning cost avoidance into visible business value.

In addition to these practices, designate an EA governance team or owner responsible for monitoring usage and spending throughout the year. This might be a cross-functional committee (including IT, finance, and procurement) or a dedicated software asset manager.

The key is to treat the EA as a strategic asset that needs regular attention. With strong governance, your organization can react quickly to changing needs and ensure Microsoft isn’t billing you for anything beyond what’s truly needed.

Checklist: EA governance team reviewing costs regularly? (Do you have accountable personnel or a team in place continuously managing EA usage and spend?)

5 Actionable Cost Optimization Best Practices

To wrap up, here are five actionable best practices that summarize the most important Microsoft EA cost optimization tactics:

• Never Buy Shelfware Upfront: Match licenses to actual needs, not Microsoft’s upsell targets.
• Reharvest Aggressively: Reassign licenses from departing or inactive users before purchasing new ones.
• Optimize Azure Continuously: Treat cloud like a utility bill that must be monitored and fine-tuned on a daily or weekly basis.
• Benchmark Relentlessly: Know what discounts and contract terms other organizations are getting, and use that intel to negotiate the best deal.
• Document Savings as Leverage: Track every cost saving and efficiency gained, and use that record to strengthen your position in renewal negotiations.

By following these strategies, CIOs and IT leaders can trim the fat from their Microsoft Enterprise Agreements. The goal is a leaner, smarter EA – one that meets your organization’s needs without wasting a penny.

In an environment where Microsoft will always try to sell you more, a cost-conscious and well-governed approach ensures you only pay for what truly brings value to your business.

Related articles

• Shelfware to Savings: Identifying Unused Licenses in Your EA
• Microsoft EA Cost Optimization Strategies (Mid-Term and Renewal)
• Microsoft 365 License Optimization: E5 vs E3 vs F3 Decisions
• Azure Cost Optimization Under an EA

Read about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Service.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit