Locations

Resources

Careers

Contact

Contact us

Post-Signature EA Management & True-Up Governance

Post-Signature EA Management & True-Up Governance (Maximizing Value After Signing)

Post-Signature EA Management & True-Up Governance

Post-Signature EA Management & True-Up

Introduction: Why Microsoft EA Management Matters After Signing

Negotiating a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) is only the beginning of the journey.

Once the ink is dry, the real work starts in managing that agreement over its multi-year term. If you “set and forget” the EA after signing, you risk compliance problems and unexpected costs that can erode the value of your hard-won negotiations. In fact, without strong post-signature governance, overspending and compliance risks tend to multiply over time.

Effective EA management ensures that your organization remains compliant with license terms and maximizes every dollar spent.

By actively governing the EA after signing, CIOs, procurement leads, and license managers can avoid unpleasant surprises, such as true-up budget shocks or Microsoft audit penalties. The goal is to capture the value negotiated in the contract and prevent value leakage through the term.

1. Establishing an EA Governance Framework

To make the most of a Microsoft EA, establish a clear governance framework immediately after signing. This means defining who will manage each aspect of the EA and how decisions will be made.

Key stakeholders typically include IT, procurement, finance, and legal — each with a distinct role to play. From tracking software deployments to overseeing budgets and ensuring compliance, every group should know its responsibilities for the EA from the outset.

Begin by establishing a cross-functional EA governance board or committee. This board should meet regularly (e.g., monthly or quarterly) to review EA-related topics such as license consumption, upcoming true-ups, budget status, and any compliance concerns.

Assign a designated EA program manager or licensing manager to coordinate this board’s activities and keep everyone aligned. This governance team acts as the central point for all EA decisions, ensuring accountability is clear whenever new licenses are needed or policy exceptions are requested.

Define roles and accountability: Document each stakeholder’s duties. For example:

  • IT – Owns and maintains an accurate inventory of deployments and user counts, and provides regular usage reports.
  • Procurement – Manages communication with Microsoft or the reseller and oversees compliance with contract terms (including any changes or amendments).
  • Finance – Ensures budget is allocated for license growth and monitors EA spending against forecasts.
  • Legal/Compliance – Monitors that usage stays within agreed entitlements and that all license use aligns with contractual and legal requirements.

When everyone knows their part, tasks are less likely to fall through the cracks.

This framework fosters transparency and control, enabling the prompt evaluation of any changes in your environment (such as new hires, projects, or acquisitions) for their potential impact on EA. A strong governance foundation is the first step in preventing compliance issues and budget overruns.

Checklist:

  • Governance team established and accountability mapped to specific roles?
  • Regular EA governance meetings scheduled (e.g., quarterly) with all stakeholders?

2. Managing the EA True-Up Process

The annual true-up is when you reconcile any growth in usage by purchasing additional licenses to stay compliant. Rather than treating it as a once-a-year fire drill, manage the true-up process as a continuous cycle.

The key is to track license usage throughout the year so that nothing is a surprise at true-up time. Implement a system or process to record the following events: whenever new employees join (requiring additional Microsoft 365 seats), new devices or servers are deployed, or new software is rolled out that falls under the EA.

Create an internal true-up calendar aligned with your EA anniversary date. Mark milestones like 90 days before the anniversary for a preliminary usage review, 60 days before for internal sign-offs, and 30 days before to finalize the true-up report.

Assign responsibilities: for instance, IT asset management can provide the latest deployment counts, while department heads confirm any new software needs in their teams. By spreading data collection throughout the year and setting clear deadlines, you avoid the last-minute scramble to gather information.

Accuracy is crucial. Double-check any unusual spike in user counts with relevant departments to ensure it reflects actual needs and not outdated or duplicate entries.

Cleansing your data (removing accounts of departed employees or decommissioned systems) before submitting the true-up report can result in significant cost savings. It ensures that you only pay for licenses that are actually in use, not for stragglers left in inventory due to oversight.

Consider negotiating EA contract clauses for reporting accuracy and correction rights — for example, the ability to adjust your true-up count if an error is discovered, or a short grace period to fix any over-counting. If such provisions weren’t included at signing, raise them with your Microsoft rep; even a small flexibility can prevent paying for an honest mistake.

Managing true-ups proactively also means budgeting for them. Finance should maintain a forecast of expected growth. If you anticipate adding 200 employees next year, plan your budget accordingly for the 200 additional licenses. Surprises are minimized when expected license growth is factored into your financial plans.

Checklist:

  • True-up timeline established with key prep milestones (e.g., quarterly usage checks, 90-day pre-review)?
  • Process in place to capture new license deployments continuously (new hires, projects, etc.)?
  • Point person or team assigned to aggregate and verify usage data before each true-up?

3. Ongoing EA Optimization

Signing an EA locks in volume discounts, but you only realize value if the licenses are actually used efficiently.

A critical post-signature task is continuously optimizing license utilization to avoid “shelfware” – licenses paid for but sitting unused. This requires monitoring how different products and license levels are adopted across the organization and making adjustments.

One focus area is right-sizing user licenses. Microsoft 365 is available in various tiers, including E3 and E5. If you purchased a bundle of E5 licenses for advanced security and voice features, ensure that users are utilizing these features.

If certain users or departments only use basic Office apps and email, they might be equally served with E3 licenses at a lower cost. It could be worth downgrading a subset of users from E5 to E3 during the term (if allowed, or plan to do so at renewal) to save money.

Similarly, keep an eye on any add-on licenses or standalone products in your EA. Common examples are Visio, Project, Power BI Pro, or Audio Conferencing add-ons. Are the employees assigned these actually using them regularly?

If not, consider reclaiming those licenses and reassigning them to others who need them, or removing them in the next true-up if possible. This prevents paying for extras that don’t deliver value.

For organizations using Azure under an EA, active cloud cost management is critical. Continuously identify and eliminate idle resources, right-size any over-provisioned workloads, and utilize reserved capacity for predictable needs.

Taking these steps can significantly reduce Azure costs (often by 15–30%) and ensure you don’t exhaust your committed budget too soon.

A few examples of optimization actions and their cost impact are illustrated below:

Product / LicenseOptimization ActionCost Impact
Microsoft 365 E5 (premium)Downgrade users to E3 if advanced features aren’t needed.Save ~20–40% per user by avoiding unnecessary premium licenses.
Add-on Licenses (Visio, etc.)Remove or reassign licenses that are rarely used.Avoid 100% of the cost of each unused add-on license (full cost savings per license).
Azure Cloud ServicesEliminate idle resources and right-size workloads; use reserved capacity for steady needs.Reduce cloud spend by ~15–30% through efficiency and planning.

Regular license utilization reviews make these optimizations possible. Schedule a recurring quarterly (or at least semi-annual) optimization review of all EA-covered products.

In these sessions, IT and business unit representatives examine usage metrics to spot unused accounts, under-utilized services, or redundant deployments. By acting on these findings – removing or reallocating idle licenses – you ensure the organization only pays for what it truly uses.

Importantly, maintain open communication with business units. Sometimes, an unused license can be repurposed for another team’s needs, avoiding the need for a new purchase. By treating licenses as a shared resource pool, you maximize utilization under the EA, rather than buying new licenses while others remain unused.

Checklist:

  • Quarterly license usage and adoption reviews scheduled and documented?
  • List of underused licenses (shelfware) maintained, with action plans to reassign or eliminate them?

4. Compliance Management Throughout the EA Term

Staying compliant with Microsoft’s licensing rules is a continuous responsibility, not a one-time task. An Enterprise Agreement typically covers a broad range of software, each with its own specific compliance metrics. Maintain accurate entitlement and deployment records throughout the EA term to ensure you’re always “audit-ready.”

Start by establishing a single source of truth for license entitlements (what you have the rights to use) and current deployments (what is actually in use). This could be a software asset management (SAM) tool or a well-managed spreadsheet/database.

Update it whenever there is a change: new servers brought online, users off-boarded, new software enabled, etc. Every license added or removed should be logged. This live inventory will be invaluable if Microsoft or a third-party auditor requests proof of compliance, and it helps internally to identify any gaps.

Conduct periodic self-audits. Conduct an internal review of your licensing position at least once a year, if not quarterly. This means comparing the number of licenses purchased (and under subscription) against the number deployed or assigned.

If an internal check finds you’ve deployed more licenses than you own in any area, take corrective action immediately (true-up ahead of schedule or uninstall/reallocate software) rather than waiting for the official true-up or an external audit.

Self-audits also identify scenarios such as employees who have left the company but still have active licenses assigned; reclaiming these licenses ensures compliance and avoids unnecessary costs.

Another aspect of compliance is documenting processes. Ensure that you have clear procedures for requesting and approving software within your organization. For example, if a department wants to deploy a new SQL Server instance, is there a check that a license is available or that it’s approved to run in an Azure VM covered by your EA? By incorporating governance into day-to-day IT operations (such as requiring a license check before deployment), you prevent compliance drift.

Proactive compliance management will save you from “surprises” during the EA term. Microsoft sometimes initiates formal license reviews or audits. If you’ve kept meticulous records and addressed any issues with your self-audits, these reviews should proceed smoothly. You’ll have confidence that there’s no significant shortfall or hidden overspend due to unused licenses. Compliance isn’t just about avoiding penalties; it’s about having control and foresight over your software assets.

Checklist:

  • Central license inventory updated with entitlements and actual use (single system of record)?
  • Regular internal license compliance audits conducted (and issues resolved)?
  • Documented process in place for new software requests and license assignments to prevent untracked usage?

5. Preparing for the Next Renewal During the Term

It may seem odd to think about the next EA renewal right after signing the current one, but smart organizations do exactly that. Renewal preparation begins on the first day of your EA term. The idea is to capture data and lessons over the term so you walk into the next negotiation armed with facts and leverage.

One practice is to maintain a renewal readiness tracker – a document or dashboard that is updated periodically (e.g., annually or after each true-up). This tracker can record key metrics, including current license counts versus originally contracted numbers, peak usage levels, new product adoption, unused licenses identified, and the amount spent on true-ups each year.

Over time, it builds a rich picture of your actual consumption patterns. For example, your data might reveal that you consistently used 10% fewer licenses than purchased, or that Azure consumption far exceeded your initial plan. Insights like these are gold for renegotiation: they highlight where you can cut back excess licenses in the next EA and where to seek better pricing for high-growth services.

Also, capture lessons learned. If you struggled with a lack of flexibility during the term – for example, needing to reduce licenses due to downsizing but your EA didn’t allow it – make a note of it. Bring up these pain points in renewal talks (e.g., request a clause to allow downward license adjustments in the next renewal).

Engage your stakeholders well in advance of the EA expiration. Procurement and IT should begin renewal planning approximately 12 months. Decide what to renew or drop, and identify any new Microsoft offerings you might need. Early preparation prevents a rushed, status-quo renewal. Instead, you can approach Microsoft with a data-backed understanding of your needs and a clear list of desired changes.

By preparing for renewal throughout the EA term, you essentially avoid leaving money on the table. You’ll enter the negotiation with confidence, backed by data and a clear understanding of what’s necessary versus what was excessive in your usage.

You’ll also have documented evidence of where the current deal didn’t meet your needs. Microsoft representatives respond when you have that level of insight; it shifts the conversation from their projections to your real-world data.

Checklist:

  • Renewal tracker updated at least annually to reflect usage, costs, and any contract-related pain points?
  • Potential changes or goals for the next EA identified (license reductions, new products, pricing targets)?
  • Renewal planning kickoff set ~12 months before contract end, with a team assigned to the strategy?

5 Actionable EA Management & True-Up Best Practices

To wrap up, here are five actionable best practices for managing your Microsoft EA after the ink is dry:

  • Create a Governance Playbook: Document the roles, responsibilities, reporting cadence, and escalation paths for EA management. Everyone involved should be aware of the decision-making process and know who to contact for any issues that may arise.
  • Run Continuous True-Up Tracking: Treat license compliance as an ongoing process, not a once-a-year event. Track changes in users and deployments in real time so your annual true-up becomes a formality, not a scramble.
  • Audit License Utilization Quarterly: Don’t Let Shelfware Fly Under the Radar. Every quarter, review which licenses are actually being used. Catch and reallocate or remove underutilized licenses to save costs before they accumulate.
  • Centralize Compliance Data: Store all licensing data – including entitlements, deployments, and costs – in a single system of record, accessible to IT, procurement, and finance. A centralized view prevents blind spots and ensures everyone works off the same facts.
  • Renewal Prep Starts Day One: Use the entire EA term to your advantage. Continuously collect usage and cost data, noting any challenges that arise. By the time renewal talks come, you’ll have a compelling, data-driven case for what you need (and what you don’t) in the next agreement.

Related articles

By implementing these practices and solid governance throughout the EA term, enterprises can maximize the value of their Microsoft investments while maintaining full compliance.

Post-signature management is where a good deal turns into great outcomes – it’s how you ensure that the EA works for your organization every step of the way.

Read about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Service.

Microsoft EA Management & True Up Strategies - How to Maximize Value After Signing

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft EA Negotiation Services?

Name

Author

  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson is the co-founder of Redress Compliance, a leading independent advisory firm specializing in Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce licensing. With over 20 years of experience in software licensing and contract negotiations, Fredrik has helped hundreds of organizations—including numerous Fortune 500 companies—optimize costs, avoid compliance risks, and secure favorable terms with major software vendors. Fredrik built his expertise over two decades working directly for IBM, SAP, and Oracle, where he gained in-depth knowledge of their licensing programs and sales practices. For the past 11 years, he has worked as a consultant, advising global enterprises on complex licensing challenges and large-scale contract negotiations.

    View all posts